Thursday 15 August 2024

 

The Author’s Art – How it’s done – Donald Hedges. (Copyright)


Putting together an autobiography.

 

There are many ways of putting together an autobiography; one can either zone in on particular stories, or highlights of one’s life or one can culture selected or edited highlights. Which one would you choose?

 

Depending on memories, I would tend to go the route of remembering from the earliest times. It sounds more authentic. The alternative is to get edited highlights or particular stories which may seem authentic, or they may not.

 

It’s like saying, I sprang fully formed from my mother’s womb and now I am 26 and I remember this, or that. Yes but the question is what were the particular circumstances which led you to the position that you remember this or that. This is where background comes into it.

 

One must in fact show that one did not spring fully formed into any one situation. For example in my first book “In the role of boy” I did not spring as a mature adult into the situation of going to New York. There would have been qualifications to get first and an employer to find before I could have found that money to get the air ticket to New York.

 

The reader must therefore be allowed to ask “How?” How did he become a tax senior, in my case? If you just tell the tale of how you were a tax senior, you are essentially missing the point.

 

This means that one has to create a background, which I hope I have done in the book that I am describing; my background was that I was a tax officer in London and was with the Revenue for four years in my 30’s. Before going to university to do a BA(Hons) Accounting degree which I passed.

 

Having done that degree, I then did one or two tax assignments before I went to RP in Winchester, one was for a firm called SMS in Southampton, the other for a firm called MC in London, E3. I was therefore confident in processing self- assessment cases in bulk and with accuracy. In April 1999 I therefore took this job on with RP and earned £10.00 an hour with it which was extremely good money. It took only one’s week’s work in June 1999 to be able to buy an air ticket.

 

That’s part of the formation of how I got my holiday. But it is not the whole formation. The back story that one might enquire into is how I got to be a tax senior in the first place and how I got into the Inland Revenue. Also, how it was that I came to have a certain amount of accounting knowledge.

 

I got into Accounting because I was in charge of a railway booking office in Oxshott; that place is in Surrey. I was originally in Hampton Court for three months but the awkwardness of the chief clerk there and the fact that he kept upsetting me was pressing on the Area Manager and he moved me.

 

I therefore got to do all the accounting records at this station; they were not especially complex but they had to be right because they involved large amounts of cash. I taught myself most of it and learned how to do it properly and carefully.

 

Somehow I was good at it and my balances were 99% spot on right. I resolved to go to college after I left British Rail so that I could get educational qualifications to add to the mix. I attended Brooklands Technical College and got an RSA Book-keeping qualification and RSA Communications certificate in the final examinations.

 

I got into the Inland Revenue because I had at least two Ordinary Levels and later I admitted to having five O Levels so they promoted me to Tax Officer. Later on I did specialist work with Repayments and I did some Institute of Taxation study.

 

At that stage I was 36; I spent the next 5 years trying to get into college/university and in 1992 was accepted. This point I really regard as the part of a life-changing situation. I had moved away from London and had embarked upon a BA(Hons) Accounting degree at Southampton Institute.

 

Those five years before going on to the degree course involved getting most of an AAT qualification (1986-1987). I had a significant amount of challenge trying to convince the Prof in charge of Accounting at Southampton Institute that I would be a suitable candidate but he did give in at the end of the interview and allow me to do the course.

 

The point is that I could have only included in the book about my degree but then people would want to know how I got there; in every autobiography there has to be a causal link between one event and the other. Otherwise it becomes a bit of nonsense.

 

A lot of the stuff that I did in London and the jobs that I did led to my change of life circumstances. The case I make is I had embarked upon a distinct change of course in my life leading to my place at Southampton Institute. That process started when I embarked upon learning accounts at British Rail. I could see that this would be very useful in the future.

 

As I said before, you have to show the causal link between your occupations in an autobiography otherwise it just becomes a series of disjointed stories.

 

If we go back even further than that, I had a lot of administrative experience gained at school. You will have read that I was secretary of the sixth form committee and editor of the House newsletter. My mother had got me a typewriter at the age of 14 and I had learned to type on it. My Dad got me another machine later. I used to type all my assignments for school whereby most other pupils were still writing theirs.

 

After school I got a job with Inner London Education Authority but before that I had copy typing jobs with many other people, Knight Frank and Rutley, Paymaster General, etc. When I left ILEA I got a copy typing and secretarial job with the Ministry of Works working for the top brass in the building inspectorate.

 

I continued to do administrative work for committees when I was at teacher training college and in the interval (summer vacations) I got temp jobs at famous employers such as Granada Group Ltd where I met Lord SB and other notables. I had a head for administrative work.

 

It was not such a question of getting lucky breaks (full formation) but of building up skills when and where I could so that I could get work. Eventually after years of work I got into something much bigger, the attempt to get a degree.

 

There’s always someone who can’t stand the fact that people are successful; I had plenty of that from my friends in Surbiton, one or two I especially remember said that I would never get anywhere and they carried on saying that despite the fact that I got nearer and nearer my goal. They could not stand the fact that I was changing.

 

My university years, both with Southampton Institute (1992-1995) and the Open University (2003-2012) gave me the ammunition with which to write properly; you have to write properly if you are doing academic writing, you really do not have any other choice.

 

When I was with the Institute I must have done at least 22 assignments and at the Open University another 20. Academic writing has to be right and it has to be properly sourced. I am glad to say that I got really good marks in almost all my assignments with both universities.

 

That brings me up to the present day, how come I wrote my autobiography? The answer that readily comes to mind is because all down the years since I was 14 that is exactly the kind of thing that I was training for all down the years. That and many memories of what I had been doing since I was at secondary school and the making of connections between events.

 

Tell your reader what the connections are; don’t let them guess. It isn’t a surprise how you got to where you are today. Save the surprises for the novels which you are going to write. The autobiography should be a series of connected events. Mine is not always but there is a pretty straight-forward line between then and now.

 

I hope your autobiography is successful and please don’t forget to make the connections between things. Don’t spring fully formed on to the page, otherwise the poor reader will be in a state of having to suspend belief.

 


 

Wednesday 14 August 2024

My Book collection by Donald Hedges

 I have now got 15 titles in my collection. These are as follows:-


The Author's Art - How its done - Kindle Amazon Publishing (Paperback and Kindle EB)

I Was that Boy - Autobiography - Kindle Amazon Publishing (Paperback and Kindle EB)

Travelogue - London and the South East - Kindle Amazon Publishing (PB and EB)

Dans le Role du Garcon - Kindle Amazon Publishing (EB)

In the role of Boy - Kindle Amazon Publishing (PB and EB)

Harley Street Murder  - Kindle Amazon Publishing (EB)

Depression my personal journey - Kindle Amazon Publishing (PB and EB)

Essays - Kindle Amazon Publishing (PB)

Murder at the Vestry - Amazon Kindle Publishing (PB)

Murder at the Manor - Amazon Kindle Publishing (PB)

I hope you will research these titles on Amazon and buy them. They are all very interesting and the autobiography does actually talk to you; it's takes the reader along with the author. In terms of the fact books you may also enjoy "The Author's Art". It shows how I wrote my autobiography and how you can write one as well. It details how other things are written, as well. .




Saturday 18 May 2024

Buy my books

 I have published two books on Amazon, In the role of Boy and the Boy Returns, the first one is £12.00 and the second one is £12.00 paperback and £14.00 in hardback. I shall write more about these two epic autobiographies as time goes by. But all I want to say at the moment is, please come and buy. Thank you.

Tuesday 28 August 2012

Good God, its Gove

I normally dont write on these pages very much, due to weight of illness and studying. But I feel that I must put pen to paper about the antics of Michael Gove, otherwise known as the Secretary of State for Education. Whilst he claims that he is not directly responsible for the downgrading of students taking exactly the same summer examinations as those students took in January, we need to take a raincheck on his claims. Thats because Gove has famously pronounced upon grade inflation; he has claimed himself to be the enemy of grade inflation. So whether or not he has directly influenced Ofqual and AQA, its an odds on chance that someone, somewhere, has listened to him and has moved the grade boundaries mid-way through a cadre of students. Whats politically interesting about this, looking at things in the round, is that this is a political attempt to put the clocks back educationally, to stop pupils in their tracks, very much as the Tories consistently tried to do during the 1950's and 1960's where only students from grammar or public schools ever went to university. He wants to turn back the clock on the progress which has been made, of actually giving the young people something when they leave school, which people of my generation never had. Those of us who went to secondary moderns were not allowed to gain O and A Levels and its a sheer fluke that I ever did. I dont want Gove and other Tories putting back the clock forty years and keeping on trying to be elitist. Thats the trouble with putting public school boys in the House of Commons; they carry on their elitist predelictions. I am sorry to say that if Gove is so unknowledgeable about the very real efforts of our youth to gain qualifications, then he needs to resign and take his bigoted views with him.

Wednesday 1 February 2012

The RBS scandal

I think that the whole thing is a seminal event in terms of morality, ethical behaviour and responsibility. The fact that this bank has been allowed to grow and leverage its balance sheet to the tune of £1.2TN, the same as the entire GDP of the United Kingdom means that here is a corporation wishing to encompass riches, power and influence far beyond the dreams of avarice. This is something out of a fairy story, or something that would have been encompassed in one of Shakespeare's tragedies. The fact that RBS wished or wanted to be bigger than everyone and everything around it, is very worrying, especially for those of us (and that means everyone) who had to pick up the bits when RBS developed a spanner in the works. Of course one could use a bank to buy up every bad debt, useless customer and subprime asset that one could and then hook it up to that bank's balance sheet. This is what in effect RBS have done, with very little constraint. They in fact do not possess sufficient sense of morality and ethics to do the opposite. Nonetheless, I dont think it is hysterical for the public to pick up on the wide sense of dis-ease that this situation has caused. This is an institution which shows that it simply does not care for the traditions and mores that have made the United Kingdom what it is. This is an institution that wants to be more than the sum of any morality or decency with which it was created. In short, it is an institution that wants to own everything, to boss everything and ultimately to get its own way so that it is bigger than any developed nation on earth. If people dont find that sense of meglomania extremely worrying, than I do; thats why comparisons with Mussolini and others are being made at this time. The truth of the matter (if thoroughly examined) is that the banks, instead of being the servant, now seek to become the master. We cant let them do it and thats why the stripping of Fred Goodwin's knighthood was an extremely good thing in the sense that we should not be pinning gongs to the pompous breasts of the four horsemen of the apocalypse.

Thursday 21 July 2011

The Great Press Scandal (or not) as you may think




The Great Press Scandal (or not) as you may think…….

The Great Press Scandal of 2011, or not, as you may think. This story starts somewhere in April 2011 and carries on kicking and screaming, until the prorogation of the Parliaments in July 2011. It has its seeds in the imprisonment of two gentlemen from the News of the World in 2008, or thereabouts, after having been convicted of phone hacking. Following an investigation headed by John Yates, AC Counter Terrorism at the yard, there was, he stated, no further need to investigate these matters. Everybody thought that was the end of the scenario but the Guardian newspaper kept on delving into the matter and eventually unearthed the factoid that many thousands had had their voicemails intercepted, including Milly Dowler, a schoolgirl from Surrey, who had been abducted and tragically murdered. To make the story that bit more complex, the editor of the newspaper News of the World had secured a position at 10 Downing Street after having retired from that newspaper and an AC from New Scotland Yard had gone on to be a journalist with this, or a similar newspaper. As more and more revelations came out, there was a worry that the Prime Minister David Cameron had made a mistake in not checking out Andy Coulson, former editor of the News of the World, before employing him at 10 Downing Street.

More and more revelations came out; the senior police officers involved in the scenario were invited to attend a Select Committee for Home Affairs – Sir Paul Stephenson, Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police appeared before that committee. He resigned his position in July 2011. John Yates, AC Counter Terrorism also appeared before that committee. He also resigned. Various people also resigned from News International, the conglomerate who produced the news of the world. One gentleman resigned from the Wall Street Journal after 52 years service. Rebekah Brooks, chief executive of News International in London, also resigned. Rupert Murdoch flew into London and closed the News of the World after 168 years.

After a series of smoke and fires within the precincts of Parliament, including hours of televised select committees, we are now no nearer into knowing, who, how, what reasons for, when, or how many? These are all forensic things that need to be known before one can make any judgment on what really happened. The Police (MPS) are further investigating the matter. They now have 50 officers on the case, although only 136 of the victims hacked have been notified and there are many thousands of victims yet to be spoken to by police. For all the sound and fury of this matter, there has been precious little progress made and it is quite significantly worrying that this is supposed to be one of the biggest scandals in British life since 1936, yet so little has been done, apart from a parade of MPs lining up to do a circus act within the chamber or the Select Committees. Oh and amusingly enough, Rupert Murdoch was assaulted with a custard pie made of shaving foam whilst speaking in the committee rooms. He stated that his appearance was the most humbling day of his life.

Nonetheless, what progress? None that I can discern; no forensic questioning on the part of anybody. No real attempt to establish a global version of the scenario with facts – who did what, what happened, when did it happened, where did it happen, who were the principals involved. All this is meat and drink to a police investigation, yet everybody else decided to turn Sherlock Holmes to try and investigate the matter, without any legal qualifications, or forensic training in police interview and investigation techniques. It makes me so sad that we as a country could have been so silly as not to know that this was all bread and circuses. Someone has said that all of these “investigations” such as the speeches in Parliament and the select committees have been a put up job so that the establishment could jump out of the way of the boulder which was coming towards them. Is there more than a grain of truth in what this person has said. Only you can decide.

Wednesday 20 July 2011

Of bread and circuses




The questions have been asked: should the Murdochs resign? I dont know about the Murdochs resigning; I have not seen one of any of the people involved doing anything sensible about anything really, except create bread and circuses.

We are no further forward in getting to the root of this matter than we were years ago when this first started. Thats because no-one is taking a long forensic look at it and asking the relevant probing questions and then drilling down until the evidence points in a direction, then following that direction.

All thats been achieved has been a few MPs saying "Please James and Rupert, did you know anything". Answer "No, I did not". "Oh, okay then, thanks awfully!"

Isn't there something so terribly British about the polite but consistent way we fail within our Parliament and Press to get to the vital points of evidence that underpin these enquiries. But the search for truth is not a circus, nor a zoo. These past two weeks have been a spectacle in truth evasion and no-one acquainted with the search for real evidence would be fooled by it in any way whatsoever.